Skip to main content

Karma as the Source of Diversity

The vedas acknowledge divine karma as the origin of all creation, preservation, and destruction. However, since God does not have desires, unlike humans, he is not constrained by them. In the first chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.6.1), we discover that karma is one of the three main causes of diversity, alongside name and form. The variety in names is a result of speech, and the variety in forms is a result of the eye, while the mind and body are the sources for the variety in actions. For every action, the body serves as the source, the controller, or the lord.  Within the body, the mind, speech, breath, organs of action, and organs of perception are regarded as the primary deities who receive sustenance from the body and carry out their respective functions. Nevertheless, we cannot solely depend on them to combat the impurities and the malevolent forces that can infiltrate our body, as they are susceptible to evil and demonic influences, thoughts, desires, temptations,...

CHANDOGYA UPANISHAD



The Chandogya Upanishad provided one of the earliest descriptions of the return of the soul after death in the story of King Pravahana Jaivali’s instruction to a great sage, Uddalaka Aruni. This instruction was known as the doctrine of the five fires.

The king explained that the world of the heavens was the first fire. The rain from the sky was the second fire, the earth the third, the male the fourth, and the female was the fifth fire. Two paths lay before the soul after the death of the person on earth. The first path took the soul to the gods and their abodes. This northern path of the gods (devayana) was for those who sought the wisdom of Being, said King Pravahana.

For those who gave alms, a second path led them to the heavenly regions of their ancestors (pitryana), eventually returning them to earth as rain, where some of them are born again as grains, shrubs and herbs to be eaten by living beings. The form the souls took on earth depended on their previous conduct: good works meant they were born again in good families; evil conduct meant being born again as animals. A third path existed for people who neither sought wisdom nor gave alms, where the soul revolved endlessly in small creatures that were born and died quickly on earth. Thus, the world became full of creatures.

The doctrine of the five fires is interestingly similar to Heraclitus’s argument that the “being” of beings is ultimately an eternal change that is like “fire.” The doctrine’s process of differentiation based on earlier conduct also recalls Deleuze’s eternal differentiating process for creating a multiplicity of beings.

Uddalaka Aruni (8th century BCE) was the chief philosopher of the Chandogya Upanishad. In a famous dialogue with his newly educated son, Uddalaka asks about Being: “Svetaketu, since you seem very arrogant about your learning, did you ask for that teaching by which the unknowable is knowable, the unperceivable is perceived, and the unhearable is heard?”

At Svetaketu’s astonishment over such learning, Uddalaka replied that first there was only Being, “until it thought may I become many and grow.” Being sent forth fire, which wanted to become many and grow, then water, then food. “Being then thought, let me enter into these three divinities of fire, water and earth and let names and forms be developed. Whatever is red is the form of fire or heat, whatever is white is the form of water, and whatever is dark is the form of the earth.” By combining these three primary forms of red, white and dark, all the other forms in the world were produced.

Uddalaka’s main argument was that Being that is Self is the essence of everything in the world, which is a multiplicity of names and forms. He told Svetaketu, “You are That.” To illustrate, he described the giant banyan (nyagrodha) tree growing from a seed containing an essence invisible to the naked eye. Similarly, when salt is mixed in water, it becomes an invisible essence that makes all the water taste salty. In the same way, the Self that is Being is the essence of the world.

Uddalaka’s simple three-word teaching of “You are That” (tat tvam asi) was the great saying of the Sama Veda to which the Chandogya Upanishad belongs, along with three other great sayings of Rig, Yajur and Atharva Vedas. Together, they encapsulated three propositions central to all the Upanishads:

1. The Self (Atman) is the essence of all living beings.

2. Being (Brahman) is the foundational principle of the universe.

3. The Self and Being are the same.

While Self and Being are gender neutral, almost all the key players of the Upanishads were male. For a view of Being that emphasizes the feminine aspect, we need to turn to the Shakti tradition with roots in the Mother Goddess practices of ordinary people in ancient India.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please tweet for any doubts or problems.

Popular posts from this blog

SILENT MIND

What are we? Is our notion of self real? How does it come into existence? Is it the sum total of our experiences and awareness? Or is it a mere notion sustained by a few persistent memories, attachments and desires? Are we the sum total of a few selected thoughts and memories or all thoughts and memories? Are we sustained by a few aspects of our past or all our past? Do we come into existence by the association of these thought and memories, or do we exist without them? If we are a selection of thoughts and memories, what happens to us when we enter into deep sleep? Do we still exist then? Such were the questions the Upanishadic seers explored in ancient India several thousands of years ago to know the secrets of existence. In doing so they followed a very unique method to minimize the interference of the mind and transcend its limitations. They silenced their minds and allowed the higher knowledge to manifest itself in their consciousness. We can do it even today. There are two types ...

PRECAP FOR BETTER RECAP

Five core Upanishad philosophies that can be learnt for managing our day-to-day life much better and looking at this blog as a precap for a better recap for this optimistic new year. 1. Samsara, Reincarnation The concept of samsara is prevalent in the Upanishads. Samsara, Sanskrit for, “wandering,” is the cycle of being. It represents reincarnation, the concept adopted by several Eastern religions of being reborn after you die according to the karmic cycle. Regardless of our personal beliefs, there’s something important to be taken from the samsara. Samsara tells us that all of life is in flux. The great wheel of life continues to turn, and nothing is ever stagnant: This vast universe is a wheel, the wheel of Brahman. Upon it are all creatures that are subject to birth, death, and rebirth. Round and round it turns and never stops. Samsara suggests that energy cannot be destroyed or diminished. It is simply transmuted. And it really is quite a poetic perspective on the cycle of deat...

PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAGGERATION

  Some scholars go overboard and become irrational in their praise of Upanishads. Undoubtedly, the Upanishads have a great value for spiritual people and the wisdom it contains can be used by worldly people also to solve their problems, build their character, reason, discretion, perception and clear thinking. However, it is debatable whether they are superior to present day works on psychology or replace them. They both belong to different domains and serve different purposes with some overlapping here and there. However, comparing them to assess their superior is like comparing apples to oranges. The Upanishads look at the mind from a spiritual perspective and the books on modern psychology, if at all they dwell upon metaphysics or soul look at it from the perspective of the mind and perceptible field of experience and cognition. Thus, one belongs to the higher or the transcendental world and the other to this world. One is divine and the other human. The Upanishads may enhance ou...